Cisco May Be Making A Run For Skype | Techcrunch

Cisco has made an offer to acquire Skype before they complete their IPO process, says one of our more reliable sources. We have not been able to confirm this rumor one way or another via other sources, which isn’t surprising. A company in lock down during the IPO process is usually even more tight lipped than normal.

via Cisco May Be Making A Run For Skype.

AT&T Sees NY Network Upgrades Wrapped Up By 3Q, SF By 4Q – WSJ.com

Image representing iPhone 3G as depicted in Cr...
Image via CrunchBase

AT&T Inc. (T) is expected to wrap up its network improvements for New York by the third quarter, with San Francisco to follow three months later, according to the company’s operations chief.

The Dallas telecommunications giant is working to upgrade its network in the two key media markets, which were hit by intense traffic primarily caused by the Apple Inc. (AAPL) iPhone. But the company has been delayed by component shortages and zoning issues, which have been particularly cumbersome in San Francisco.

The improvements are critical to AT&T repairing the reputation of the network, which suffers from the perception that its coverage lags behind rival Verizon Wireless. It also will enable the company to offer additional features, such as tethering for the iPhone, which allows a handset’s cellular signal to be used like a modem.

Other AT&T smartphones allow tethering.

“It’s taking longer than we’d like,” said John Stankey, chief executive of AT&T Operations, in an interview with Dow Jones. “The dynamics of San Francisco are different.”

The New York improvements are proceeding on schedule, he said, adding that the work in San Francisco is roughly 90 days behind as a result of the logistical complications.

Last month, the company said the number of dropped calls on its third-generation, or 3G, network fell 6% in Manhattan and 9% in the New York metropolitan area, but acknowledged that San Francisco was behind. Earlier Wednesday, Ralph de la Vega, who runs AT&T’s wireless and consumer businesses, told investors that the New York metrics have “improved significantly.”

via CORRECT: AT&T Sees NY Network Upgrades Wrapped Up By 3Q, SF By 4Q – WSJ.com.

Microsoft Wins Best Legal Department of 2010 | Corporate Counsel

It was a holiday gift ten years and billions of dollars in the making.

On Dec. 16, 2009, Microsoft Corporation’s legal department settled the company’s longest and most expensive antitrust legal battle. In a major concession to European regulators, the software giant agreed to open its Windows operating system to rival Web browsers.

Microsoft’s general counsel, Brad Smith, and his legal team spent months last year hammering out the details of the 61-page settlement with the European Commission, the European Union’s executive body. By fall, Microsoft’s legal department had held 24 videoconferences and 34 conference calls with E.C. lawyers. “We wanted to be seen as a company that would work with regulators,” said deputy general counsel David Heiner, who heads the antitrust group and led much of the negotiations.

Some have called the settlement one of Smith’s crowning achievements. He and his legal team ended more than a decade of close scrutiny by European regulators. The software colossus can keep doing business across the Atlantic, and the stage is now set for better relations with Brussels. “There could have been an endless succession of slug-it-out battles to the death, and instead Microsoft elected to make some perhaps unwelcome but nonetheless significant concessions,” said Ian Forrester, a partner at White & Case who represented Microsoft in Brussels. The case, he said, is “a really extraordinary piece of legal history.”

The settlement was also symbolic for the company’ s legal team, which has set out to prove that it can resolve disputes amicably, despite Microsoft’s reputation for aggressively fighting legal disputes to their bitter, final end. And much of that effort has focused on building relationships and listening to what the other side wants, and fears. “We have tried to make that a defined part of how we train people to negotiate — in any context,” Smith said. “That is not always successful, but has been widely successful for us.”

Since Smith took the helm of Microsoft’s in-house legal department in 2002, he’s led a campaign to recast his company’s pugnacious image and come to terms with both regulators and Redmond’s fiercest competitors. Last year, for example, along with resolving the Brussels imbroglio, the department helped put together a friendly partnership deal with Yahoo! Inc. after months of acrimonious takeover discussions. The E.C. agreement was the culmination of Smith’s diplomatic offensive.

That’s not to imply that Microsoft has gone all touchy-feely. It remains a formidable legal opponent, especially when it comes to protecting the company’s most valuable asset — its intellectual property. Last year the legal department won two precedent-setting patent defense victories on appeal. Meanwhile, it stopped several consumer lawsuits from getting class certification.

Those litigation successes are among the many reasons we have awarded Microsoft’s lawyers the accolade of Best Legal Department of 2010. It's the fifth time we’ve given out the award, and, as usual, the competition was extremely tight. Corporate Counsel’s writers and editors spent days debating, arguing, and exchanging sometimes heated e-mails. After sending reporters to interview the finalists, we confirmed our ultimate choice.

via Law.com – Microsoft Wins Best Legal Department of 2010.

HP Set to Launch webOS Extravaganza With Tablets, Printers, and More | DailyTech

PALO ALTO, CA - SEPTEMBER 16:  The HP logo is ...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

Palm Inc. has struggled in recent years and has been passed, first by Research in Motion, next by Microsoft, then by Apple, and most recently by Google in terms of smartphone market share.  The company finally received some good news on April 28 when the world’s top PC maker, Hewlett-Packard Co., announced that it would be scooping it up for $1.2B USD.

HP’s CEO Mark Hurd discussed the acquisition during the company’s quarterly earnings call yesterday and said that the real key to it is webOS, Palm’s recently developed smartphone operating system.  Hurd elates, “[The proposed deal] isn’t precisely a smartphone play, as I’ve seen some people write.  It is, for us, strategically broader.  We expect to leverage WebOS into a variety of form factors, including ‘slates’ and Web-connected printers.”

The first webOS tablet to hit will likely be the Hurricane, the replacement for the scrapped Slate.  There are reports that the Hurricane will launch in Q3 2010.

The switch from planned Windows tablets to webOS tablets leaves questions about how it will effect the company’s relationship with Microsoft, makers of the Windows operating system.  Mr. Hurd insists, however, that everything is peachy between the pair and that his company will use whatever OS best fits the task — which he says is webOS when it comes to small form factors.

via DailyTech – HP Set to Launch webOS Extravaganza With Tablets, Printers, and More.

Microsoft Accuses Salesforce.com of Infringing Software Patents – BusinessWeek

Microsoft Corp. said it sued Salesforce.com Inc. today, accusing the company of infringing nine patents for ways to make software more efficient.

The complaint targets the customer-relationship management, or CRM, software that is the hallmark of Salesforce.com’s business. It seeks a court order that would prevent the San Francisco-based company from providing features that Microsoft claims it invented.

Salesforce.com, founded in 1999, offers software that businesses subscribe to and use over the Internet for running marketing campaigns and tracking sales leads. It competes against Microsoft’s Dynamics software in the CRM market.

“Microsoft has been a leader and innovator in the software industry for decades and continues to invest billions of dollars each year in bringing great software products and services to market,” said Horacio Gutierrez, the Redmond, Washington-based company’s deputy general counsel for intellectual property and licensing. Microsoft “cannot stand idly by when others infringe” our intellectual property rights, he said.

The complaint was filed in federal court in Seattle after more than a year of talks, according to Microsoft, the world’s biggest software maker.

via Microsoft Accuses Salesforce.com of Infringing Software Patents – BusinessWeek.

Cloud Service Users Face Confusing Legal Landscape – PCWorld Business Center

Cloud computing has great benefits for businesses but legal uncertainties threaten to hamper adoption, said a group of lawyers speaking during a seminar in Seattle this week.

“We will have to create a robust legal system and we will have to do it sooner rather than later and before we have the cloud computing equivalent of an offshore oil rig blowout,” said Barry J. Reingold, a partner at Perkins Coie in Washington, D.C.

Lawyers speaking at the Law Seminars International event on Monday offered advice about the types of research companies should do before signing up for cloud services to make sure they can protect themselves from potential legal fallout.

One of the most important issues facing companies that wish to store or process data in the cloud is determining which legal systems have jurisdiction over the data. “It’s a can of worms,” said Andy James, a lawyer with Osborne Clarke.

A company using a cloud service could have users all over the world and those users’ information could be shifted to facilities around the globe. “So there are four possible legal locations for the information at any moment,” James said. Laws applicable to the location of the company’s headquarters, the location of the servers, the location of the consumer and the location of the communications equipment transmitting the information between the user and the provider could all potentially apply.

Unfortunately, he said, different jurisdictions have made different choices on which of those locations to base their cloud rules on.

via Cloud Service Users Face Confusing Legal Landscape – PCWorld Business Center.

France: A New Haven For Anti-suit Injunctions? | Kluwer Arbitration Blog

In the aftermath of the turmoil West Tankers has created in the arbitration community, the Cour de cassation has confirmed France’s reputation as being an arbitration-friendly jurisdiction by holding that anti-suit injunctions are not contrary to international public policy.

A French company (In Zone Brands Europe) had entered into an exclusive distribution agreement of beverages with an American company (In Zone Brand International). The contract granted jurisdiction to the courts of Georgia (USA). After the termination of the agreement by the American company, the French distributor and Mr X., President of In Zone Brands Europe sued it for damages before the Tribunal de commerce of Nanterre (France), whose jurisdiction was challenged by the American party. In parallel, In Zone Brand International seized the Superior Court of Cobb County, Georgia (USA). In a judgment dated 3 March 2006, the American judge issued an anti-suit injunction ordering the French party to discontinue the proceedings before the French courts and held that the French company owed monies to the American one. In Zone Brand International then sought recognition and enforcement (“exequatur”) of the American judgment (i.e. the anti-suit injunction) in France. On 17 April 2007, the Cour d’appel of Versailles upheld the decision of the first instance judges and recognised the anti-suit injunction granted by the Superior Court of Cobb County. On 14 October 2009, the Cour de cassation confirmed this ruling. (1)

The French Supreme Court approved the anti-suit injunction on the ground that “n’est pas contraire à l’ordre public international l’”anti suit injunction” dont, hors champ d’application de conventions ou du droit communautaire, l’objet consiste seulement, comme en l’espèce, à sanctionner la violation d’une obligation contractualle préexistante.” (2)

The judges’ reasoning consisted in verifying whether the three conditions required for enforcement of foreign decisions (as set forth by the last French Supreme Court case rendered in that respect) were fulfilled: (3) (i) the absence of fraudulent avoidance of the normally applicable law, (ii) the evidence of a sufficient link between the dispute and the foreign court having rendered the judgment subject to recognition and enforcement proceedings, and (iii) the enforcement of the judgement is not contrary to international public policy. Concerning the first condition, the Court has pointed out that “no fraud could arise out from seizing a court which has been expressly agreed to have jurisdiction“.

via Kluwer Arbitration Blog » Blog Archive » France: A New Haven For Anti-suit Injunctions?.

Apple: Gizmodo’s iPhone leak ‘immensely damaging’ to profit – May. 17, 2010

Apple said the theft and leak of its new iPhone prototype will have a “huge” negative effect on the company's earnings.

According to recently released court documents, Apple attorney George Riley told a detective in the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office that the leaked images of the phone were “immensely damaging” to the company.

“By publishing details about the phone and its features … people that would have otherwise purchased a currently existing Apple product would wait for the next item to be released, thereby hurting overall sales and negatively [a]ffecting Apple’s earnings,” Riley said, according to the detective’s affidavit.

The detective said Riley could not estimate exactly how much of a financial hit Apple would take from the incident, but he believed it would be ‘huge.’”

via Apple: Gizmodo’s iPhone leak ‘immensely damaging’ to profit – May. 17, 2010.

Twitter Business Center Ushers Customer Service into the Age of Engagement

As the social media phenomenon continues to guide and enrich web engagement strategies, more and more companies are responding with holistic touch points for their customers. Twitter’s rendition, called the Twitter Business Center, allows businesses to interact with their customers even if they're not following them.

Features Coming Soon…

Don’t get too excited just yet—Twitter’s business center is still in beta. Presently only a few chosen companies are able to enjoy the new features, which include:

Contributors Tab: The Contributors tab will streamline the tweeting process by enabling multiple users to access the account and tweet on the company’s behalf.

Verified Business Accounts: Previously only available to individuals, Verified Twitter accounts aim to assist in building trust between businesses and their customers. Now consumers won’t have to wonder whether the company they’re interacting with on Twitter is really the company, or just someone pretending to be affiliated with them.

DM Customers You’re Not Following: This is the biggie, especially for businesses with a large audience on the micro-blogging platform. Without requiring followership in order to communicate privately, Twitter is expanding the number of opportunities for interaction. Customers will be able to build a rapport with the brands they care about, and businesses can conduct customer service without it being in the full view of the public.

The feature is optional, of course, so if for any reason you’d rather not have customers contacting you directly, you don’t have to.

via Twitter Business Center Ushers Customer Service into the Age of Engagement.

Transocean Asks to Cap Rig Liability at $26.7 Million – BusinessWeek

Transocean Ltd., the owner and operator of the oil rig leased to BP Plc which exploded last month and killed 11 men, has asked a U.S. judge to limit its liability to $26.7 million.

The request, filed today in Houston federal court under a 150-year-old law originally designed for the shipping industry, applies to all litigation the company faces over the explosion and spill.

“I think there are more than 100 cases now,’’ Guy Cantwell, Transocean’s spokesman, said in a telephone interview.

Transocean and co-owners of the Deepwater Horizon, which now lies wrecked a mile deep in the Gulf of Mexico, say the state-of-the-art drilling rig has zero present value and had accrued $26.7 million in unpaid drilling rental fees.

The company also asked for all litigation against the rig owners to be consolidated before one federal judge in Houston, where Transocean’s U.S. operations are based. Vernier, Switzerland-based Transocean said it would create a court- administered fund, equal to the amount of the unpaid drilling fees, from which all claims against the company could be paid on a pro-rata basis.

Lawyers for victims of the rig disaster and spill said that while Transocean’s move to limit its liability probably wouldn’t succeed, it could cause the oil spill litigation to be consolidated into a single multidistrict proceeding in Houston federal court, as BP has also requested.

via Transocean Asks to Cap Rig Liability at $26.7 Million (Update3) – BusinessWeek.